Some Freewriting About Future Projects
As I contemplate whether and perhaps how to embark on a new textbook project,
I imagine how a new text might embody my current thinking about teaching and
the pushing of writing. A new text would have to sing the social turn and new
media. A new text would have to pour forth on the second Web. A new text would
have to pour forth with headphones filling spaces between my ears. That’s
the ticket to the new textbook ride, a rhythm bumping behind the concentrated
raking forward of assignments, exercises, and texts. Work with it, the rhythm.
The wetter pieces will be media layered over and into the instruction, the pieces
themselves new media compositions to turn the crank on new media composition.The book will be beautiful. It must be. Books are. But the shape’s the question. Moldy modes of discourse? Arguments? Topics? Themes? No matter. The rhythm will drive it. The book will flow and projects will shape it. Projects like the playlist or the collage. Projects brought forth on the second Web with lots of samples, ideas, and revisions of writers (students). Labels and categories must swirl colorfully into the mix. Making new things. The rhythm behind. No ideas but in tags? Rhythm things? Flowing always through the teaching surfaces of the project must be projects.
And it always must be ready to ask the audience, “How you feeling?” “Is this thing on?” Pfwhheeaaaa. Pfwhhuueaa. Not just while building the book, but while building from the book. Teach to build, and build to teach. The project is cranking on teaching, and that will happen outside of the three-year cycle of current textbook production. Dates must guide groups and mark time, but rolling out the teaching will pace with the rhythm of the years. Fall. Winter. Spring. Summer off? Summer off. This is a textbook manifesto from a writing pusher.
Don’t doubt that there will be some layering of deeply dabbled new media mixtures. Visual. Yes, very. Texts. Yes, the word. Yes, Yes, the word. Audio. Absolutely. Music matters more than we’ve realized in the classroom. Sing. Play. Listen and sing. And touch. Let's not forgot writing moves the body just as the body moves the word, even through cyberspace. Paintbrush. Shadow. Filter. Print. Push. Push. Push.



Comments
I like "texboook"! But maybe with a few more Os: "texbooooook", stretched as long as you need it, like Google does.
The idea of writing a textbook confounds me. So many examples I've seen which attempt to be different, hip, whatever turn out to be the same old stuff. Of course, that's not necessarily because of decisions made by the writers, but because today's hip is tomorrow's old hat.
But I should do it anyway, because I too often reinvent the wheel when there are perfectly good wheels out there I could bolt on and use just fine...
Posted by: cbd | February 20, 2006 09:00 AM
I completely get the point about inventing the wheel. Textbook writing is such a conflicted topic/decision for dozens of reasons. And yes, there is an adoption-inertia that severly limits opportunities for reshaping what gets published. It is easy to spin this as marketing control (which it no doubt is) but it also has to do with the evolution of knowledge and real world teaching pressures. Beginning with what is familiar is necessary in so many ways when it comes to teaching, so textbooks resonate with that in part because too radical a shift would be unworkable (more for instructors than for students, maybe).
I know Steve Krause has posted on these issues as well. I intend to write up some more thoughts on the whole conflicted proposition, including my own motivations which I'm honest enough to admit are in part financial--another conflicted topic.
Posted by: Daniel Anderson | February 20, 2006 11:24 AM